{
  "controls": [
    {
      "control": "Different sectors or epochs only",
      "evidence": "CW11 Figures 1–2",
      "finding": "Distinct tracks coexist within a single slice; a sectors-only explanation is inadequate for the published pattern.",
      "status": "SOURCE_LEVEL_COUNTEREVIDENCE",
      "remaining": "No independent raw-image trajectory reconstruction."
    },
    {
      "control": "One rigid front with constant ridge spacing",
      "evidence": "CW11 Figure 2",
      "finding": "Differential motion, deceleration and a later branch contradict this restricted model.",
      "status": "RESTRICTED_MODEL_CONTRADICTED",
      "remaining": "One deforming or driver-coupled disturbance with multiple intensity ridges remains possible."
    },
    {
      "control": "Two continuously propagating independent fronts",
      "evidence": "CW11 Figure 2",
      "finding": "The trailing track becomes nearly stationary. Two propagating MHD discontinuities cannot be asserted throughout the interval.",
      "status": "FULL_INTERVAL_CLAIM_NOT_SUPPORTED",
      "remaining": "Earlier physical independence is not disproved; it is not established either."
    },
    {
      "control": "Front versus loop/driver restructuring",
      "evidence": "CW11 Figures 1 and 3; source interpretation",
      "finding": "This is a relevant retained physical alternative, not a rejected nuisance.",
      "status": "NOT_EXCLUDED",
      "remaining": "No co-registered plasma-state discontinuity or complete driver-surface reconstruction."
    },
    {
      "control": "Cadence or difference-processing artefact",
      "evidence": "CW11 Figures 2 and 4",
      "finding": "Published cadence degradation supports the importance of temporal sampling. It does not test all reference-image or filtering choices.",
      "status": "PARTIAL_SOURCE_CONTROL",
      "remaining": "Original sequence, alternative references, undifferenced images and uncertainty propagation were not reprocessed."
    },
    {
      "control": "Projection or multiple ridges of one evolving disturbance",
      "evidence": "CW11 Figures 1–3",
      "finding": "The surface-slice construction is not an independent local 3-D surface measurement.",
      "status": "NOT_EXCLUDED",
      "remaining": "Local depth, normal, correspondence and plasma association are unbounded."
    },
    {
      "control": "Stationary brightness mistaken for propagation",
      "evidence": "CW11 Figure 2",
      "finding": "Early inclined and later nearly horizontal trailing patterns require separate phases.",
      "status": "PHASE_SEPARATION_REQUIRED",
      "remaining": "Do not carry the early reported speed into the late stationary phase."
    }
  ],
  "gate_distinct_image_tracks": "SUPPORTED_AT_SOURCE_LEVEL",
  "gate_two_independent_propagating_MHD_fronts": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
  "gate_not_two_independent_fronts": "NOT_PROVED",
  "do_not_conflate": "Failure to establish physical independence is not proof of a single front."
}